Difference between revisions of "Gunsopedia talk:Guidelines"
From Gunsopedia
(→Before anyone asks: new section) |
(→Before anyone asks) |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
Yes, I know that these policies will mean that some work that has already been done will need to be done again and some will pull their hair out over it, but I really do think that this is going to save everyone a LOT of grief down the road. As usual, I'm open to suggestions... --[[User:Dennis|Dennis]] ([[User talk:Dennis|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2013 (CDT) | Yes, I know that these policies will mean that some work that has already been done will need to be done again and some will pull their hair out over it, but I really do think that this is going to save everyone a LOT of grief down the road. As usual, I'm open to suggestions... --[[User:Dennis|Dennis]] ([[User talk:Dennis|talk]]) 12:49, 21 April 2013 (CDT) | ||
| + | * YA THINK?? Dont mind me saying so but a lot of grief could have been saved by dong this in the first place. just sayin. But I see one problem with your plan here - if Im reading your toolbox right, youre still going to be transcluding the date page. Why transclude it and bother with all that <nowiki><noinclude></nowiki> noneselse in the first place? Why not just | ||
| + | *# make a template that just calls to the other pages like 'whenever/whatever' | ||
| + | *# fill the template out into every date page so ANY changes can be made globally from the template itself | ||
| + | *# ...? | ||
| + | *# PROFIT! | ||
| + | : The main thing -thats bugging me at least- is that every little change has to be done on a kajillion pages just to conform. Its nuts. Better one template on every page. Changes? BAM! one edit. Done. Just sayin. --[[User:Admin|ComAdmin]] ([[User talk:Admin|talk]]) 14:54, 21 April 2013 (CDT) | ||
Revision as of 14:54, 21 April 2013
Before anyone asks
Yes, I know that these policies will mean that some work that has already been done will need to be done again and some will pull their hair out over it, but I really do think that this is going to save everyone a LOT of grief down the road. As usual, I'm open to suggestions... --Dennis (talk) 12:49, 21 April 2013 (CDT)
- YA THINK?? Dont mind me saying so but a lot of grief could have been saved by dong this in the first place. just sayin. But I see one problem with your plan here - if Im reading your toolbox right, youre still going to be transcluding the date page. Why transclude it and bother with all that <noinclude> noneselse in the first place? Why not just
- make a template that just calls to the other pages like 'whenever/whatever'
- fill the template out into every date page so ANY changes can be made globally from the template itself
- ...?
- PROFIT!
