Editing 5.45x39mm

Jump to: navigation, search

Warning: You are not logged in.

Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.
The edit can be undone. Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision Your text
Line 87: Line 87:
  
 
==Wounding effects==
 
==Wounding effects==
[[File:AK-74 5.45x39mm wound ballistics.gif|thumb|300px|AK-74 5.45×39mm wound ballistics]]
 
 
 
Early ballistics tests done demonstrated a pronounced tumbling effect with high speed cameras.<ref>[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3912/is_200112/ai_n9010648/pg_3 Terminal ballistics of the Russian AK 74 assault rifle: Two wounded patients and experimental findings]</ref>  Some Western authorities believed this bullet was designed to tumble in flesh to increase wounding potential.  
 
Early ballistics tests done demonstrated a pronounced tumbling effect with high speed cameras.<ref>[http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3912/is_200112/ai_n9010648/pg_3 Terminal ballistics of the Russian AK 74 assault rifle: Two wounded patients and experimental findings]</ref>  Some Western authorities believed this bullet was designed to tumble in flesh to increase wounding potential.  
  
At the time, it was believed that [[yaw]]ing and [[cavitation]] of projectiles was primarily responsible for tissue damage. Non-Soviet alarmists feared that this new cartridge had achieved wounding parity with the [[5.56x45mm NATO]] round. To dispute this, [[Martin Fackler]] conducted a study using live pigs and [[ballistic gelatin]] demonstrating that the 5.45 mm round does not reliably fragment or cause unusual amounts of tissue disruption. <ref>[http://www.btammolabs.com/fackler/ak74_wounding_potential.pdf Wounding Potential of the AK-74 Assault Rifle]</ref> Most organs and tissue were too flexible to be severely damaged by the temporary cavity effect caused by yaw and cavitation of a projectile. With the 5.45 mm bullet, tumbling produced a temporary cavity twice, at depths of 100 and 400 mm. This is comparable to modern 7.62x39mm ammunition and to (non-fragmenting) 5.56 mm ammunition. The average width of a human trunk is 400 mm.
+
At the time, it was believed that yawing and cavitation of projectiles was primarily responsible for tissue damage. Non-Soviet alarmists feared that this new cartridge had achieved wounding parity with the [[5.56x45mm NATO]] round. To dispute this, [[Martin Fackler|Fackler]] conducted a study using live pigs and [[ballistic gelatin]] demonstrating that the 5.45 mm round does not reliably fragment or cause unusual amounts of tissue disruption. <ref>[http://www.btammolabs.com/fackler/ak74_wounding_potential.pdf Wounding Potential of the AK-74 Assault Rifle]</ref> Most organs and tissue were too flexible to be severely damaged by the temporary cavity effect caused by yaw and cavitation of a projectile. With the 5.45 mm bullet, tumbling produced a temporary cavity twice, at depths of 100 and 400 mm. This is comparable to modern 7.62x39mm ammunition and to (non-fragmenting) 5.56 mm ammunition. The average width of a human trunk is 400 mm.
 
+
Military 5.45×39mm rounds offer better penetration over (fragmenting) military 5.56×45mm NATO rounds.<ref name="frfrogspad.com">http://www.frfrogspad.com/terminal2.htm | Military rifle bullet wound patterns comparison charts – by Martin L. Fackler.</ref><ref name="Russian AK-74 Assault Rifle 1984">http://ammo.ar15.com/project/Fackler_Articles/ak74_wounding_potential.pdf Wounding Potential of the Russian AK-74 Assault Rifle. Martin L. Fackler MD. John S. Surinchak MA. John A. Malinowski BS. & Robert E. Bowin. The Journal of Trauma 1984. The Williams & Wilkins Co. Vol. 24, No. 3</ref> However, unlike its 5.56mm counterpart, the 5.45mm round “does not deform or fragment when striking soft tissues.”<ref name="frfrogspad.com"/><ref name="Russian AK-74 Assault Rifle 1984"/> Nevertheless, during the Soviet Afghan war the Mujahedeen called the 5.45×39mm round the "Poison Bullet" due to the severe wounds it was reputed to produce to extremities and the resulting need to amputate.<ref>The Gun Digest Book of the AK & SKS: A Complete Guide to Guns, Gear and Ammunition. By Patrick Sweeney. Gun Digest Books, 2009. page 104-105</ref><ref>Gun Digest Book of The Tactical Rifle: A User's Guide. By Patrick Sweeney. Krause Publications, 2011. page 151</ref><ref>http://www.atncorp.com/night-vision-reviews/SPEC-WEAPONS-09-PS23-CGT.pdf  Tandal AK-74S 5.45mm Bringing the AK into the 21st century with modular capability! By Charlie Cutshaw Photos by Doug Richardson. SPECIAL WEAPONS 2009. page 32-37</ref>
+
  
 
==Anti-armor effect==
 
==Anti-armor effect==

Please note that all contributions to Gunsopedia may be edited, altered, or removed by other contributors. If you do not want your writing to be edited mercilessly, then do not submit it here.
You are also promising us that you wrote this yourself, or copied it from a public domain or similar free resource (see Gunsopedia:Copyrights for details). Do not submit copyrighted work without permission!

Cancel | Editing help (opens in new window)
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
Toolbox